4.8 Article

Isobaric Multiplex Labeling Reagents for Carbonyl-Containing Compound (SUGAR) Tags: A Probe for Quantitative Glycomic Analysis

Journal

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 91, Issue 4, Pages 3141-3146

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b05757

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [U01CA231081, R01 DK071801, R21 AG055377, RF1 AG052324]
  2. Robert Draper Technology Innovation Fund grant
  3. Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARP)
  4. Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) program through the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) [UL1TR000427]
  5. NIH shared instrument grant [NIH-NCRR S10RR029531]
  6. Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation
  7. University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Pharmacy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Glycans are highly complex entities with multiple building units and different degrees of branched polymerization. Intensive research efforts have been directed to mass spectrometry (MS)-based qualitative and quantitative glycomic analysis due to the important functions of glycans. Among various strategies, isobaric labeling has become popular because of its higher multiplexing capacity. Over the past few years, several isobaric chemical tags have been developed for quantitative glycomics. However, caveats also exist for these tags, such as relatively low reporter ion yield for aminoxyTMTlabeled complex glycans. To overcome the limitations of existing isobaric chemical tags, we designed a class of novel isobaric multiplex reagents for carbonyl-containing compound (SUGAR) tags that can be used to label glycans for quantitative glycomic analysis. The quantitative performance including labeling efficiency, quantification accuracy, and dynamic range of these SUGAR tags has been evaluated, showing promising results. Finally, the 4-plex SUGAR tags have been utilized to investigate N-glycan changes of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) pediatric patients before and after chemotherapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available