4.7 Article

EPA's non-targeted analysis collaborative trial (ENTACT): genesis, design, and initial findings

Journal

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 411, Issue 4, Pages 853-866

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-018-1435-6

Keywords

ToxCast; Ring-trial; Exposome; High-resolution mass spectrometry; CompTox chemicals dashboard

Funding

  1. EPA [EP-C-14-001, EP-D-12-034, EP-16-W-000115]
  2. EPA Stage 1-3 Pathfinder Innovation Project Building a Network to Measure the Totality of Chemical Exposures

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In August 2015, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) convened a workshop entitled Advancing non-targeted analyses of xenobiotic chemicals in environmental and biological media. The purpose of the workshop was to bring together the foremost experts in non-targeted analysis (NTA) to discuss thestate-of-the-science for generating, interpreting, and exchanging NTA measurement data. During the workshop, participants discussed potential designs for a collaborative project that would use EPA resources, including the ToxCast library of chemical substances, the DSSTox database, and the CompTox Chemicals Dashboard, to evaluate cutting-edge NTA methods. That discussion was the genesis of EPA's Non-Targeted Analysis Collaborative Trial (ENTACT). Nearly 30 laboratories have enrolled in ENTACT and used a variety of chromatography, mass spectrometry, and data processing approaches to characterize ten synthetic chemical mixtures, three standardized media (human serum, house dust, and silicone band) extracts, and thousands of individual substances. Initial results show that nearly all participants have detected and reported more compounds in the mixtures than were intentionally added, with large inter-lab variability in the number of reported compounds. A comparison of gas and liquid chromatography results shows that the majority (45.3%) of correctly identified compounds were detected by only one method and 15.4% of compounds were not identified. Finally, a limited set of true positive identifications indicates substantial differences in observable chemical space when employing disparate separation and ionization techniques as part of NTA workflows. This article describes the genesis of ENTACT, all study methods and materials, and an analysis of results submitted to date.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available