4.6 Article

Outcomes of immunosuppression minimization and withdrawal early after liver transplantation

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages 1397-1409

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15205

Keywords

clinical research/practice; clinical trial; immunosuppression/immune modulation; immunosuppressive regimens - minimization/withdrawal; infection and infectious agents viral: hepatitis C; liver transplantation/hepatology; tolerance

Funding

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [UM1AI109565, UM2AI117870]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Immune Tolerance Network ITN030ST A-WISH assessed immunosuppression withdrawal in liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C or nonimmune nonviral liver disease. Of 275 recipients enrolled before transplantation, 95 were randomly assigned 4: 1 to withdrawal (n = 77) or maintenance (n = 18) 1-to 2-years posttransplant. Randomization eligibility criteria included stable immunosuppression monotherapy; adequate liver and kidney function; = Stage 2 Ishak fibrosis; and absence of rejection on biopsy. Immunosuppression withdrawal followed an 8-step reduction algorithm with = 8 weeks per level. Fifty-two of 77 subjects (67.5%) reduced to = 50% of baseline dose, and 10 of 77 (13.0%) discontinued all immunosuppression for = 1 year. Acute rejection and/or abnormal liver tests were treated with increased immunosuppression; 5 of 32 rejection episodes required a methylprednisolone bolus. The composite end point (death or graft loss; grade 4 secondary malignancy or opportunistic infection; Ishak stage = 3; or > 25% decrease in glomerular filtration rate within 24 months of randomization) occurred in 12 of 66 (18%) and 4 of 13 (31%) subjects in the withdrawal and maintenance groups. Early immunosuppression minimization is feasible in selected liver recipients, while complete withdrawal is successful in only a small proportion. The composite end point comparison was inconclusive for noninferiority of the withdrawal to the maintenance group.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available