4.3 Article

HPV Testing With 16, 18, and 45 Genotyping Stratifies Cancer Risk for Women With Normal Cytology: Data From the Baseline Phase of the Onclarity Trial

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY
Volume 151, Issue 4, Pages 433-442

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqy169

Keywords

Cervical cancer screening; Cotesting; Human papillomavirus; Genotype; Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; Negative for intraepithelial lesions and malignancies; Adjunct testing

Categories

Funding

  1. Becton, Dickinson and Company, BD Life Sciences-Diagnostic Systems

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives To determine the BD Onclarity human papillomavirus (HPV) assay performance and risk values for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) or higher and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) or higher during Papanicolaou/HPV cotesting in a negative for intraepithelial lesions or malignancies (NILM) population. Methods In total, 22,383 of the 33,858 enrolled women were 30 years or older with NILM cytology. HPV+ and a subset of HPV- patients (3,219/33,858 combined; 9.5%) were referred to colposcopy/biopsy. Results Overall, 7.9% of women were Onclarity positive; HPV 16 had the highest prevalence (1.5%). Verification bias-adjusted (VBA) CIN2 or higher and CIN3 or higher prevalences were 0.9% and 0.3%, respectively. Onclarity had VBA CIN2 or higher (44.1%) and CIN3 or higher (69.5%) sensitivities, as well as CIN2 or higher (92.4%) and CIN3 or higher (92.3%) specificitiesall similar to Hybrid Capture 2. HPV 16, 18, 45, and the other 11 genotypes had CIN3 or higher risks of 6.9%, 2.6%, 1.1%, and 2.2%, respectively. Conclusions Onclarity is clinically validated for cotesting in NILM women. Genotyping actionably stratifies women at greater CIN3 or higher risk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available