4.6 Article

Chemically modified peanut extract shows increased safety while maintaining immunogenicity

Journal

ALLERGY
Volume 74, Issue 5, Pages 986-995

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/all.13687

Keywords

immunogenicity; modification; mouse model; peanut allergy; subcutaneous immunotherapy

Funding

  1. HAL Allergy BV, Leiden, The Netherlands

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundPeanuts are most responsible for food-induced anaphylaxis in adults in developed countries. An effective and safe immunotherapy is urgently needed. The aim of this study was to investigate the immunogenicity, allergenicity, and immunotherapeutic efficacy of a well-characterized chemically modified peanut extract (MPE) adsorbed to Al(OH)(3). MethodsPeanut extract (PE) was modified by reduction and alkylation. Using sera of peanut-allergic patients, competitive IgE-binding assays and mediator release assays were performed. The immunogenicity of MPE was evaluated by measuring activation of human PE-specific T-cell lines and the induction of PE-specific IgG in mice. The safety and efficacy of MPE adsorbed to Al(OH)(3) was tested in two mouse models by measuring allergic manifestations upon peanut challenge in peanut-allergic mice. ResultsCompared to PE, the IgE-binding and capacity to induce allergic symptoms of MPE were lower in all patients. PE and MPE displayed similar immunogenicity invivo and invitro. In mice sensitized to PE, the threshold for anaphylaxis (drop in BT) upon subcutaneous challenge with PE was 0.01mg, while at 0.3mg MPE no allergic reaction occurred. Anaphylaxis was not observed when PE and MPE were fully adsorbed to Al(OH)(3). Both PE and MPE+Al(OH)(3) showed to be efficacious in a model for immunotherapy. ConclusionIn our studies, an Al(OH)(3) adsorbed MPE showed reduced allergenicity compared to unmodified PE, while the efficacy of immunotherapy is maintained. The preclinical data presented in this study supports further development of modified peanut allergens for IT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available