4.7 Article

A hybrid reduced-order framework for complex aeroelastic simulations

Journal

AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 84, Issue -, Pages 880-894

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2018.11.014

Keywords

Reduced-order model; Hybrid modeling; Aeroelasticity; Neural networks; Unsteady aerodynamics

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11572252]
  2. National Science Fund for Excellent Young Scholars [11622220]
  3. 111 project of China [B17037]
  4. ATCFD project [2015-F-016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper develops a hybrid and parallel-structured reduced-order framework for modeling unsteady aerodynamics, which incorporates both linear and nonlinear system identification methods. To reflect unsteady flow physics, the hybrid model introduces time-delayed output feedback to both linear and nonlinear subsystems. The linear output and nonlinear residual are identified by the autoregressive with exogenous input model and the multi-kernel neural network, respectively. The proposed approach is illustrated here with the reduction of computational-fluid-dynamics-based aeroelastic analysis of a NACA0012 airfoil oscillating in transonic and viscous flows. In particular, we exploit the potential of this model in analyzing complex aeroelastic phenomena including limit-cycle oscillations, the beat phenomenon at high reduced velocities, and nodal-shaped oscillations induced by the interaction between buffet and flutter. Results demonstrate that the proposed approach approximates the dynamically linear and nonlinear aerodynamic characteristics obtained from high-fidelity time-marching methods with a high level of accuracy. This framework can be used as a general reduced-order modeling strategy to represent dynamic systems exhibiting both linear and nonlinear characteristics. (C) 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available