4.8 Article

Effect of Chemical Bonding Characteristics on Ordering Structure in Li Spinel Oxides

Journal

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201805972

Keywords

chemical bonding; ordering; spinel oxides; transmission electron microscopy

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [2014R1A4A1003712, 2017M2A2A6A01019608, 2018R1A2B2006133]
  2. Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy [10065691]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2018R1A2B2006133, 2017M2A2A6A01019608] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An ordered configuration between atoms is frequently observed in many alloys and complex ionic compounds, as the ordering structure is energetically more stable in terms of the lattice enthalpy. However, when the entropy effect becomes dominant with increasing temperature, the ordered configurational symmetry is subject to be thermally perturbed, resulting in a transition to a random distribution of atoms at elevated temperature. By comparing two Li(B ' B '')(2)O-4-type spinel oxides having an identical space group and analogous compositions, it can be elucidated that the locally distinct chemical bonding characteristics, which are substantially covalent versus highly ionic, make a significant contribution to the formation of ordering. More importantly, such ordering structure is considerably robust without perturbation even at very high temperature near the melting point. The findings in this work suggest that the locally different bonding nature is one of the critical structure-determining factors in complex oxides with multiple cations, emphasizing the significance of in-depth understanding of the correlation of electronic configurations with the overall crystalline structure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available