4.5 Article

Secure and privacy-preserving orchestration and delivery of fog-enabled IoT services

Journal

AD HOC NETWORKS
Volume 82, Issue -, Pages 113-125

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2018.08.002

Keywords

Security; Privacy; Fog computing; Orchestration; Internet of things

Funding

  1. European Commission [H2020-700540 CANVAS]
  2. Spanish Government [TIN2014-57364-C2-R SmartGlacis, TIN2016-80250-R Sec-MCloud, TIN2015-70054-REDC]
  3. Spanish DGT [SPIP2017-02250 ISSUM]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fog-enabled IoT applications are the next step in the deployment of cloud computing backed services through the Internet. The use of fog nodes at the edge of the network reduces traffic to cloud servers, decreases latency of services and improves ubiquity. Security is, however, a fundamental challenge of fog computing because both fog and IoT nodes may be deployed in disperse non-secure locations. Solutions to this challenge rely on expensive cryptography, such as attribute-based encryption of homomorphic encryption, which significantly degrades the response time of the service delivery due to the limited resources of IoT nodes. In this paper, we tackle this issue by relying on the novel concept of fog orchestration. Through orchestration, the network is self-tailored to the service to be delivered, and we use this possibility to enable a secure and efficient service delivery. Specifically, we propose several secure and privacy-by-design protocols for the orchestration and delivery fog-enabled IoT services. We also assume the most challenging scenario in which nodes exchange data in open and potential unsecured networks and they can be subjected to a wide range of active attacks. The feasibility of our proposal and the improvements it brings over related works are discussed through a set of theoretical and empirical evaluations of its performance. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available