4.5 Article

The association of religiosity with suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in the United Kingdom

Journal

ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA
Volume 139, Issue 2, Pages 164-173

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/acps.12972

Keywords

religiosity; suicidality; risk factor; nationally representative study; the United Kingdom

Categories

Funding

  1. Miguel Servet - National R + D + I [CP13/00150, PI15/00862]
  2. ISCIII-General Branch Evaluation and Promotion of Health Research
  3. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF-FEDER)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective The goal was to analyze the association of religiosity with suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in a UK nationally representative sample. Methods This study used cross-sectional data from 7403 people who participated in the 2007 Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey (APMS). Religion was assessed with the question 'Do you have a specific religion?' with 'yes' and 'no' answer options. Lifetime and past 12-month suicidal ideation and suicide attempts were assessed. The association between religiosity and suicidality was studied in multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for sociodemographic, behavioural, and psychopathological factors. Results Compared to those without a religion, the prevalence of past 12-month suicidal ideation (3.2% vs. 5.4%), past 12-month suicide attempts (0.4% vs. 0.9%), lifetime suicidal ideation (11.2% vs. 16.4%), and lifetime suicide attempts (3.6% vs. 6.0%) was lower among those with a religion. In the fully adjusted model, having a religion was significantly associated with lower odds for all types of suicidality except past 12-month suicide attempts: suicidal ideation (past 12-month: OR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.51-0.99; lifetime: OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.69-0.99) and suicide attempts (past 12-month: OR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.35-1.45; lifetime: OR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.53-0.90). Conclusion There is a negative association between religiosity and suicidality in the UK. Future studies should focus on the underlying mechanisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available