4.5 Article

Neurodevelopmental difficulties negatively affect health-related quality of life in children with idiopathic clubfoot

Journal

ACTA PAEDIATRICA
Volume 108, Issue 8, Pages 1492-1498

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/apa.14709

Keywords

Clubfoot; EQ-5D-Y; Five to Fifteen questionnaire; Health-related quality of life; Neurodevelopmental difficulties

Categories

Funding

  1. Doctoral School in Health Care Science at Karolinska Institutet
  2. Gavofonden
  3. Stiftelsen Frimurare Barnhuset
  4. Promobila Foundation
  5. Sallskapet barnavard
  6. Sunnerdahls Handikappfond

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim To study health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in children with idiopathic clubfoot (IC) and the influence of sex, clubfoot laterality and neurodevelopmental difficulties (NDD) on HRQoL. Methods A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study in Stockholm and Skane Counties, Sweden, of 106 children with IC born 2004-2007 (mean 9.4 +/- 0.6 years) and a general population sample of 109 schoolchildren (mean 9.5 +/- 0.6 years). The children and their caregivers answered the EQ-5D-Y (Youth) and Five to Fifteen questionnaires to operationalise HRQoL and NDD, respectively. Results No reduced HRQoL on the EQ-5D-Y dimensions were reported by 51% of the children with IC, and 71% in the general population sample, with significant more problems in the IC sample regarding 'mobility', 'doing usual activities' and 'having pain or discomfort', despite similar overall health status. Neither sex nor clubfoot laterality affected HRQoL. Children with IC and NDD combined reported more problems in three out of five dimensions and lower overall health status compared with children with IC alone. Conclusion Despite similar overall health status, children with IC had more HRQoL problems compared with the general population, being associated with coexisting NDD but not sex or clubfoot laterality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available