4.5 Article

Community case management of lower chest indrawing pneumonia with oral amoxicillin in children in Kenya

Journal

ACTA PAEDIATRICA
Volume 107, Issue -, Pages 44-52

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/apa.14405

Keywords

Chest indrawing; Community health workers; Integrated community case management; Pneumonia; Sub-Saharan Africa

Categories

Funding

  1. Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research
  2. Norwegian Government Agency for Development Cooperation
  3. Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency
  4. United Kingdom Department for International Development
  5. UNICEF

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim To determine the accuracy and effectiveness of community health workers (CHWs) when compared to trained nurses for management of pneumonia in Kenyan children. Methods In Homabay County in western Kenya, children 2-59 months of age with lower chest indrawing pneumonia were identified, classified and treated by CHWs with oral amoxicillin (90 mg/kg per day) for five days at home. Trained nurses visited the child within 24 hours to verify diagnosis; and on day 4 and 14 to assess treatment outcomes. Results CHWs identified 1906 children with lower chest indrawing pneumonia. There was an 88.7% concordance in classification and treatment for lower chest indrawing pneumonia by CHWs compared to nurses. Children with moderate malnutrition (OR 1.68; 95% CI: 1.22-2.30), comorbidities such as diarrhoea or malaria (OR 1.55; 95% CI: 1.32-1.81) or an additional day of delay in care seeking (OR 1.06; 95% CI: 1.02-1.10) were more likely to have an incorrect classification of lower chest indrawing by the CHW. Comorbidity (OR 1.66; 95% CI: 1.12-2.48) and fast breathing (OR 4.66; 95% CI: 1.26-17.27) were significantly associated with treatment failure on day 14. Conclusion CHWs can correctly manage lower chest indrawing pneumonia even in high-mortality settings, such as western Kenya, in sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available