4.0 Article

Collapsin Response Mediator Protein 1, a Novel Marker Protein for Differentiated Odontoblasts

Journal

ACTA HISTOCHEMICA ET CYTOCHEMICA
Volume 51, Issue 6, Pages 185-190

Publisher

JAPAN SOC HISTOCHEMISTRY & CYTOCHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1267/ahc.18030

Keywords

collapsin response mediator protein 1 (CRMP1); odontoblasts; Runx2

Categories

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [15K11015]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K11015] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We previously reported that the terminal differentiation of odontoblasts was inhibited in Runx2 transgenic {Tg(Col1a1-Runx2)} mice under the control of the 2.3-kb Col1a1 promoter. Odontoblasts in Tg(Col1a1-Runx2) mice lose their characteristic long cellular processes, and show marked reductions in the protein levels of markers for odontoblasts, such as dentin sialophosphoprotein, nestin, and microtubule-associated protein tau (Mapt). We herein demonstrated that collapsin response mediator protein 1 (CRMP1), a neuronal phosphoprotein that participates in various aspects of neuronal development, was specifically expressed in the differentiated odontoblasts of wild-type, but not Tg(Col1a1-Runx2) tooth germs by comparing expression profiles in wild-type and Tg(Col1a1-Runx2) mouse molars using microarray and immunohistochemical analyses. CRMP1 expression was detected at a slightly later differentiation stage in odontoblasts than type 1 collagen, nestin, and Mapt expression, which was observed from the onset of dentinogenesis. Among these proteins, CRMP1 was the most specifically localized in odontoblasts in the tooth germ. In erupted molars, odontoblast-specific CRMP1 expression decreased with age. These results indicate that CRMP1 is a novel marker protein for differentiated odontoblasts in mouse tooth germs, and suggest that CRMP1 participates in the morphogenesis of functioning odontoblasts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available