4.8 Article

In Situ Synthesis and Unprecedented Electrochemical Performance of Double Carbon Coated Cross-Linked Co3O4

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 10, Issue 49, Pages 42372-42379

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b15604

Keywords

lithium ion battery; transition metal oxides; double carbon coating; Co3O4; electrochemical performance

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51703087, 21805117]
  2. Jiangsu Province Science Foundation for Youths [BK20180209]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development Fund of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Improving the structural stability and the electron/ion diffusion rate across whole electrode particles is crucial for transition metal oxides as next-generation anodic materials in lithium-ion batteries. Herein, we report a novel structure of double carbon-coated Co3O4 cross-linked composite, where the Co3O4 nanoparticle is in situ covered by nitrogen-doped carbon and further connected by carbon nanotubes (Co3O4 NP@NC@CNTs). This double carbon-coated Co3O4 NP@NC@CNTs framework not only endows a porous structure that can effectively accommodate the volume changes of Co3O4, but also provides multidimensional pathways for electronic/ionic diffusion in and among the Co3O4 NPs. Electrochemical kinetics investigation reveals a decreased energy barrier for electron/ion transport in the Co304 NP@NC@CNT5, compared with the single carbon-coated Co3O4 NP@NC. As expected, the Co3O4 NP@NC@CNT electrode exhibits unprecedented lithium storage performance, with a high reversible capacity of 1017 mA h g(-1) after 500 cycles at 1 A g(-1), and a very good capacity retention of 75%, even after 5000 cycles at 15 A g(-1). The lithiation/delithiation process of Co3O4 NP@NC@CNTs is dominated by the pseudocapacitive behavior, resulting in excellent rate performance and durable cycle stability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available