4.8 Article

First-Principles Determination of Active Sites of Ni Metal-Based Electrocatalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 10, Issue 46, Pages 39624-39630

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b12573

Keywords

hydrogen evolution reaction; Ni metal electrocatalysts; partial oxidation; Boltzmann distribution; Gibbs free energy

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21636006, 21473108, 21173138]
  2. National Key R&D program of China [2017YFB0203404]
  3. 111 Project [B14041]
  4. Australian Research Council [DP 170104834]
  5. Australian Commonwealth Government
  6. Pawsey Supercomputing Centre in Perth
  7. Australian government
  8. Government of Western Australia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The determination of active sites of materials is essential for the molecular design of high-performance catalysts. In this study, the first-principles method is applied to investigate the active sites of low-cost Ni metal-based electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reactions (HER), which is a promising alternative to expensive Pt metal-based catalysts. The adsorption of hydrogen on different sites of pristine and partially oxidized Ni(111) surface is investigated. All of the possible configurations have been systematically investigated here with the consideration of their Boltzmann distribution. Using the Gibbs free energy of intermediate H atoms (Delta G(H)*) as a descriptor, it is found that the AG,. increases with the increase of the coverage of oxygen atoms. The slightly oxidized surface Ni atoms are theoretically identified to be the best catalytic centers for the electrocatalytic HERS when the coverage of oxygen is considerably low. On the basis of the analyses of Bader charge distribution and density of states, our results reveal that the superior performance of the slightly oxidized surface Ni atoms can be ascribed to the optimal electronic properties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available