4.6 Article

The Relationship of Arterial Wall Enhancement Ratio on MRI with the Degree of Inflammation in a Rabbit Aneurysm Model: A Pilot Study

Journal

ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 10, Pages E292-E297

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.12.004

Keywords

Aneurysm; Aneurysm model; Rabbit; Elastase; Magnetic resonance imaging

Funding

  1. research project of Third Military Medical University [2016YLC22]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rationale and Objectives: To identify the relationship between enhancement ratio (ER) of aneurysm walls and degrees of inflammation. Materials and Methods: Twenty-five white rabbits were used in this study; all underwent surgery to isolate the right common carotid artery (RCCA). Twenty rabbits underwent an aneurysm creation procedure, and 5 underwent a control procedure. In the aneurysm creation procedure, there was surgical exposure of the origin of RCCA and temporary occlusion with an aneurysm clip. The distal RCCA was ligated, and the trapped segment was infused with elastase for 20 minutes, after which the clip was removed. In the control procedure, the trapped segment was infused with saline. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging was performed at weeks 2, 3, 4, and 5 after the procedure, and wall ER was calculated. After MRI, aneurysms were harvested and stained with hematoxylin-eosin. Pearson correlation analysis and scatter plots were used to evaluate the relationship between wall ER and the degree of inflammation. The relationships between the wall ER, the number of inflammatory cells and time were analyzed by linear graphs. Results: Wall ER positively correlated with inflammatory cell count of the aneurysm wall (r = 0.877, p < 0.001). The relationships between wall ER, the number of inflammatory cells, and time increased and then decreased according linear graphs. Conclusion: In this study, the aneurysm wall ER was confirmed to be associated with the degree of inflammation on the rabbit aneurysm model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available