4.3 Article

Heterogeneity in Valuation of Travel Time Reliability and In-Vehicle Crowding for Mode Choices in Multimodal Networks

Journal

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/JTEPBS.0000187

Keywords

Mode choice; Heterogeneity; Willingness to pay (WTP); Travel time reliability (TTR); In-vehicle crowding

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51578414, 71571138]
  2. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (STCSM) [17DZ1205302]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities in China
  4. Peak Discipline Open Fund of Transportation Engineering of Tongji University [2016J012302]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To support scientific planning and management of transportation systems, this paper carries out comprehensive stated preference (SP) surveys to investigate commuters' mode choice behavior in multimodal networks. Efficient scenarios are designed using the utility-balance principle to incorporate four commonly used commuting modes and four decisive factors influencing mode choices. Random parameter logit (RPL) models are used to estimate commuters' willingness to pay (WTP) quantitatively and explore preference heterogeneity. In particular, the potential factors yielding heterogeneity in valuation of travel time reliability (TTR) and in-vehicle crowding are identified. The results indicate large heterogeneities in WTP for TTR improvement and in-vehicle crowding reduction. Demographic attributes (age and education), commuting distance, and time schedule variables (flexible work time and departure time constraints) could partially explain travelers' heterogeneity in WTP for TTR. Age, gender, income, and education levels are identified as having significant influences on WTP for reducing in-vehicle crowding. This study provides useful references for transport demand forecasting and implications for transport policy-making in a multimodal network. (C) 2018 American Society of Civil Engineers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available