4.5 Article

Heavy metal and microbial safety assessment of raw and cooked pumpkin and Amaranthus viridis leaves grown in Abakaliki, Nigeria

Journal

FOOD SCIENCE & NUTRITION
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages 1537-1544

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.739

Keywords

16S rDNA; Amaranthus viridis; heavy metals; ITS rDNA; microbial safety; pumpkin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, heavy metal and microbial safety assessment of raw and cooked pumpkin and Amaranthus viridis leaves grown in Abakaliki, Nigeria, was examined. The levels of lead (Pb), arsenic (As), chromium (Cr), cadmium (Cd), and mercury (Hg) were evaluated using atomic absorption spectrophotometer. The microbial cells were counted and further identified to species level using 16S rDNA and ITS rDNA sequencing analysis at CABI microbial identification services United Kingdom (UK). The results showed that the heavy metal concentrations of lead (10.5, 12.0), arsenic (7.5, 8.5), chromium (0.9, 0.1), and mercury (13.1, 14.0) in the pumpkin and A.viridis leaves, respectively, were above maximum acceptable limit according to relevant national and international food regulatory agencies (Tables and ). Cooking significantlyreduced the concentrations of the heavy metals at (p > 0.05) to or below, lead (6.8, 8.4), arsenic (5.1, 6.1), chromium (0.6.0.1), and mercury (9.5, 11.4) in the pumpkin and A.viridis leaves, respectively, but still not to international safe limit. The result of the microbial safety assessment showed that the microbial load of both the pumpkin and Amaranthus viridis leaves were above acceptable limit and the contaminating organisms were identified as Escherichia coli (504743), Klebsiella pneumonia (504744b), and Aspergillus flavus (504740).This study therefore shows that the vegetables (pumpkin and A.viridis leaves) contain unacceptable levels of toxic heavy metals and potentially dangerous pathogenic microorganisms, thus present significant health risk for the consumers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available