4.2 Article

Lessons from a peer-led obesity prevention programme in English schools

Journal

HEALTH PROMOTION INTERNATIONAL
Volume 32, Issue 2, Pages 250-259

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dau008

Keywords

school based; adolescent; obesity prevention; health education

Funding

  1. Centre for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions for Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), a UKCRC Public Health Research Centre of Excellence
  2. British Heart Foundation
  3. Cancer Research UK
  4. Economic and Social Research Council [RES-590-28-0005]
  5. Medical Research Council
  6. Welsh Government
  7. Wellcome Trust of the UK Clinical Research Collaboration [WT087640MA]
  8. Wellcome Trust
  9. MRC [MR/K023233/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [DRF-2010-03-51] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)
  11. Medical Research Council [MR/K023233/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  12. National Institute for Health Research [DRF-2010-03-51] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Obesity in young people is a major public health concern. Energy balance, the interrelationship between diet and physical activity, is known to be a key determinant. Evidence supports the development of school-based approaches to obesity prevention. ASSIST (A Stop Smoking in Schools Trial) is an effective school-based, peer-led smoking prevention programme for 12-13-year-old students, based on diffusion of innovations theory. The AHEAD (Activity and Healthy Eating in ADolescence) study tested the feasibility of adapting ASSIST to an obesity prevention intervention. The AHEAD intervention was tested and refined during a pilot study in one school, followed by an exploratory trial in six schools. Quantitative (self-report behavioural questionnaires and evaluation forms) and qualitative (structured observations, focus groups and interviews) research methods were used to examine the implementation and acceptability of the intervention. The potential effectiveness of the intervention in increasing healthy eating was measured using self-report behavioural questionnaires. Activity monitors (accelerometers) were used to measure physical activity. Results show it was feasible to implement the AHEAD intervention, which was well received. However, implementation was resource and labour intensive and relatively expensive. Furthermore, there was no evidence of promise that the intervention would increase physical activity or healthy eating in adolescents. Although diet and physical activity are both relevant for obesity prevention, the focus on two behaviours appeared too complex for informal diffusion through peer networks. This identifies a tension, particularly for adolescent peer-led health promotion, between the desire not to isolate or oversimplify health behaviours and the need to present clear, succinct health promotion messages.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available