4.6 Article

The role of social and ecological processes in structuring animal populations: a case study from automated tracking of wild birds

Journal

ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.150057

Keywords

dispersal; great tit; group living; immigration; paridae; social organization

Funding

  1. ERC Advanced grant [AdG 250164]
  2. Microsoft Research
  3. Australian National University
  4. NERC
  5. BBSRC [BB/L006081/1]
  6. NSF [NSF-IOS 1250895]
  7. Natural Environment Research Council [1223292] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  9. Direct For Biological Sciences [1250895] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Both social and ecological factors influence population process and structure, with resultant consequences for phenotypic selection on individuals. Understanding the scale and relative contribution of these two factors is thus a central aim in evolutionary ecology. In this study, we develop a framework using null models to identify the social and spatial patterns that contribute to phenotypic structure in a wild population of songbirds. We used automated technologies to track 1053 individuals that formed 73 737 groups from which we inferred a social network. Our framework identified that both social and spatial drivers contributed to assortment in the network. In particular, groups had a more even sex ratio than expected and exhibited a consistent age structure that suggested local association preferences, such as preferential attachment or avoidance. By contrast, recent immigrants were spatially partitioned from locally born individuals, suggesting differential dispersal strategies by phenotype. Our results highlight how different scales of social decision-making, ranging from post-natal dispersal settlement to fission-fusion dynamics, can interact to drive phenotypic structure in animal populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available