4.7 Article

Fine scale spatial genetic structure in Pouteria reticulata (Engl.) Eyma (Sapotaceae), a dioecious, vertebrate dispersed tropical rain forest tree species

Journal

GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION
Volume 1, Issue -, Pages 43-49

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2014.07.002

Keywords

Barro Colorado Island; Dioecy; Gene dispersal; Microsatellite; Neotropical tree; Spatial genetic structure

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation's Research Experience for Undergraduates program [DEB 064039]
  2. Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dioecious tropical tree species often have small flowers and fleshy fruits indicative of smallinsect pollination and vertebrate seed dispersal. We hypothesize that seed mediated gene flow should be exceed pollen-mediated gene flow in such species, leading to weak patterns of fine scale spatial genetic structure (SGS). In the present study, we characterize novel microsatellite DNA markers and test for SGS in sapling (N = 100) and adult trees (N = 99) of the dioecious canopy tree Pouteria reticulata (Sapotaceae) in a 50 ha forest dynamics plot on Barro Colorado Island (BCI), Panama. The five genetic markers contained between five and 15 alleles per locus, totaling 51 alleles in the sample population. Significant SGS at local spatial scales (< 100 m) was detected in the sapling (dbh approximate to 1 cm) and adult (dbh >= 20 cm) size classes, but was stronger in the former (sapling Sp = 0.010 +/- 0.004, adult Sp = 0.006 +/- 0.002), suggesting demographic thinning. The degree of SGS was lower than the value expected for non-vertebrate dispersed tropical trees (Sp = 0.029), but similar to the average value for vertebrate dispersed tropical trees (Sp = 0.009) affirming the dispersal potential of vertebrate dispersed tropical trees in faunally intact forests. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available