4.5 Article

Electron densities inferred from plasma wave spectra obtained by the Waves instrument on Van Allen Probes

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS
Volume 120, Issue 2, Pages 904-914

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2014JA020857

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. JHU/APL under NASA [921647, NAS5-01072]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The twin Van Allen Probe spacecraft, launched in August 2012, carry identical scientific payloads. The Electric and Magnetic Field Instrument Suite and Integrated Science suite includes a plasma wave instrument (Waves) that measures three magnetic and three electric components of plasma waves in the frequency range of 10Hz to 12kHz using triaxial search coils and the Electric Fields and Waves triaxial electric field sensors. The Waves instrument also measures a single electric field component of waves in the frequency range of 10 to 500kHz. A primary objective of the higher-frequency measurements is the determination of the electron density n(e) at the spacecraft, primarily inferred from the upper hybrid resonance frequency f(uh). Considerable work has gone into developing a process and tools for identifying and digitizing the upper hybrid resonance frequency in order to infer the electron density as an essential parameter for interpreting not only the plasma wave data from the mission but also as input to various magnetospheric models. Good progress has been made in developing algorithms to identify f(uh) and create a data set of electron densities. However, it is often difficult to interpret the plasma wave spectra during active times to identify f(uh) and accurately determine n(e). In some cases, there is no clear signature of the upper hybrid band, and the low-frequency cutoff of the continuum radiation is used. We describe the expected accuracy of n(e) and issues in the interpretation of the electrostatic wave spectrum.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available