4.6 Article

Expression of E-selectin ligands on circulating tumor cells: cross-regulation with cancer stem cell regulatory pathways?

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
Volume 2, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2012.00103

Keywords

circulating tumor cells; cancer stem cells; epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition; selectins; selectin ligands; cell adhesion

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CBET-1106118, CBET-1039869, BES-0547165]
  2. National Institutes of Health [1R15CA161830-01]
  3. Ohio Cancer Research Associates
  4. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  5. Directorate For Engineering [1106118, 1039869] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although significant progress has been made in the fight against cancer, successful treatment strategies have yet to be developed to combat those tumors that have metastasized to distant organs. Poor characterization of the molecular mechanisms of cancer spread is a major impediment to designing predictive diagnostics and effective clinical interventions against late stage disease. In hematogenous metastasis, it is widely suspected that circulating tumor cells (CTCs) express specific adhesion molecules that actively initiate contact with the vascular endothelium lining the vessel walls of the target organ. This tethering is mediated by ligands expressed by CTCs that bind to E-selectin expressed by endothelial cells. However, it is currently unknown whether expression of functional E-selectin ligands on CTCs is related to cancer stem cell regulatory or maintenance pathways, particularly epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and the reverse, mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition. In this hypothesis and theory article, we explore the potential roles of these mechanisms on the dynamic regulation of selectin ligands mediating CTC trafficking during metastasis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available