4.3 Article

Repeated Intraperitoneal alpha-Radioimmunotherapy of Ovarian Cancer in Mice

Journal

JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY
Volume 2010, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2010/394913

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Swedish Cancer Society [3548]
  2. King Gustaf V Jubilee Clinic Research Foundation in Gothenburg, Sweden

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of a-radioimmunotherapy of ovarian cancer in mice using different fractionated treatment regimens. The study was performed using the monoclonal antibody MX35 F(ab')(2) labeled with the alpha-particle emitter At-211. Methods. Nude mice were intraperitoneally inoculated with similar to 1 x 10(7) cells of the cell line NIH: OVCAR-3. Four weeks later 6 groups of animals were given 400 kBq 211 At-MX35 F(ab')(2) as a single or as a repeated treatment of up to 6 times (n = 18 in each group). The fractionated treatments were given every seventh day. Control animals were treated with unlabeled MX35 F(ab')(2) (n = 12). Eight weeks posttreatment the animals were sacrificed and the presence of macro-andmicroscopic tumors and ascites was determined. Results. The tumor-free fractions (TFFs) of the animals, defined as the fraction of animals with no macro-and microtumors and no ascites, were 0.17, 0.11, 0.39, 0.44, 0.44, and 0.67 when treated with 400 kBq 211 At-MX35 F(ab')(2) once or 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 times, respectively. Repeated treatment 3 times or more resulted in a significantly higher (P <.05) TFF than compared to treatment once or twice. The presence of ascites decreased from 15 out of 18 animals in the group given only one treatment to zero for the 2 groups given 5 or 6 fractions. Treatment with unlabeled MX35 F(ab') 2 resulted in a TFF of zero. Conclusion. Weekly repeated intraperitoneal injections of tolerable amounts of activity of At-211-MX35 F(ab') 2 of up to 6 times produced increased therapeutic efficacy without observed toxicity, indicating a potential increase of the therapeutic index.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available