4.3 Article

Loss of miR-200c: A Marker of Aggressiveness and Chemoresistance in Female Reproductive Cancers

Journal

JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY
Volume 2010, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2010/821717

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program Idea Award [BC084162]
  2. Career Development Award (National Cancer Institute Cancer Center) [P30-CA046934]
  3. M. D. Anderson Uterine Specialized Program of Research Excellent Grant [CA098258]
  4. Thorkildsen Research Fund Endowment
  5. DOD Breast Cancer Idea Award [BC084162]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We focus on unique roles of miR-200c in breast, ovarian, and endometrial cancers. Members of the miR-200 family target ZEB1, a transcription factor which represses E-cadherin and other genes involved in polarity. We demonstrate that the double negative feedback loop between miR-200c and ZEB1 is functional in some, but not all cell lines. Restoration of miR-200c to aggressive cancer cells causes a decrease in migration and invasion. These effects are independent of E-cadherin status. Additionally, we observe that restoration of miR-200c to ovarian cancer cells causes a decrease in adhesion to laminin. We have previously reported that reintroduction of miR-200c to aggressive cells that lack miR-200c expression restores sensitivity to paclitaxel. We now prove that this ability is a result of direct targeting of class III beta-tubulin (TUBB3). Introduction of a TUBB3 expression construct lacking the miR-200c target site into cells transfected with miR-200c mimic results in no change in sensitivity to paclitaxel. Lastly, we observe a decrease in proliferation in cells transfected with miR-200c mimic, and cells where ZEB1 is knocked down stably, demonstrating that the ability of miR-200c to enhance sensitivity to paclitaxel is not due to an increased proliferation rate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available