4.4 Article

Relieving nasal congestion in children with seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis: efficacy and safety studies of mometasone furoate nasal spray

Journal

WORLD ALLERGY ORGANIZATION JOURNAL
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/1939-4551-6-5

Keywords

Mometasone furoate nasal spray; Placebo; Pediatric; Nasal congestion; Allergic rhinitis; Efficacy; Safety; Controlled clinical trial

Funding

  1. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Whitehouse Station, NJ USA
  2. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: In surveys of children with allergic rhinitis (AR), nasal congestion has been identified as the most frequently experienced and bothersome symptom. This analysis was conducted to investigate the effect of mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) on congestion in children with AR. Methods: Two multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies randomly assigned children to MFNS 100 mu g or placebo, 1 spray/nostril QD for 4 weeks (Study 1: ages 6-11 years with seasonal AR [SAR] >= 1 year; Study 2: ages 3-11 years with perennial AR [PAR] >= 1 year). Least square (LS) means were obtained from an ANCOVA model with treatment and study center effects, with baseline score as a covariate. We conducted post hoc evaluation of changes from baseline in AM/PM PRIOR (average of reflective AM and PM scores) nasal congestion (0=none to 3=severe). Results: Study 1: MFNS (n=134) reduced congestion significantly more than placebo (n=135) on day 2 (P=.004) and on 23/29 days (P=.037). Change from baseline was-0.53 and-0.28 for MFNS and placebo (P<.001) over days 1-15 and-0.64 and-0.38 for MFNS and placebo (P<.001) over days 1-29. Study 2: MFNS (n=185) reduced congestion significantly more than placebo (n=189) on day 3 (P=.015) and on 22/29 days (P=.047). Change from baseline was -0.56 and-0.36 for MFNS and placebo (P<.001) over days 1-15 and-0.64 and-0.45 for MFNS and placebo (P<.001) over days 1-29. MFNS was well tolerated, with no unusual or unexpected adverse events. Conclusion: MFNS effectively relieved nasal congestion and was well tolerated in children with SAR or PAR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available