4.7 Article

A simplified wave enhancement criterion for moving extreme events

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS
Volume 120, Issue 11, Pages 7538-7558

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2015JC011284

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Russian Science Foundation [15-17-20020]
  2. ESA SMOS-Storm project
  3. ESA-GasFlux project
  4. Russian Science Foundation [15-17-20020] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An analytical model is derived to efficiently describe the wave energy distribution along the main transects of a moving extreme weather event. The model essentially builds on a generalization of the self-similar wave growth model and the assumption of a strongly dominant single spectral mode in a given quadrant of the storm. The criterion to anticipate wave enhancement with the generation of trapped abnormal waves defined as gr/u(r)(2) approximate to c(T)(u(r)/V)(1/q), with r, u, and V, radial distance, average sustained wind speed, and translation velocity, respectively. Constants q and c(T) follow the fetch-law definitions. If forced during a sufficient time scale interval, also defined from this generalized self-similar wave growth model, waves can be trapped and large amplification of the wave energy will occur in the front-right storm quadrant. Remarkably, the group velocity and corresponding wavelength of outrunning wave systems will become wind speed independent and solely related to the translating velocity. The resulting significant wave height also only weakly depends on wind speed, and more strongly on the translation velocity. Compared to altimeter satellite measurements, the proposed analytical solutions for the wave energy distribution demonstrate convincing agreement. As analytically developed, the wave enhancement criterion can provide a rapid evaluation to document the general characteristics of each storm, especially the expected wavefield asymmetry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available