4.3 Article

Relationship between KRAS mutations and dual time point 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in colorectal liver metastases

Journal

ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages 2059-2066

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-018-1740-8

Keywords

18F-FDG PET; CT; Dual time-point imaging; Colorectal cancer; Liver metastasis; KRAS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeTo investigate the association between metabolic parameters of dual time point F-18-FDG PET/CT imaging and Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) mutation status in colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).MethodsForty-nine colorectal cancer patients with 87 liver metastatic lesions were included in this retrospective study. KRAS gene mutation tests were also performed for all the patients. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was measured for each hepatic metastatic lesion on both early and delayed scans, and the change of SUVmax (SUVmax) and retention index (RI) were calculated. Uni-variate and multi-variate analyses were employed to determine the relationship between any PET/CT parameters and KRAS mutation status.ResultsThirty-seven (42.5%) liver metastatic lesions harboring KRAS mutations were identified. The SUVmax of CRLM with KRAS mutation both on early and delayed scans was significantly higher than those with wild-type KRAS (10.76.0 vs. 7.8 +/- 3.3, P=0.002; 15.5 +/- 10.1 vs. 10.0 +/- 4.2, P<0.001, respectively). Compared with wild-type KRAS CRLM, SUVmax and RI (%) of CRLM with KRAS mutation were also significantly higher than those with wild-type KRAS (4.8 +/- 4.7 vs. 2.2 +/- 2.0, P<0.001; 45.3 +/- 28.2 vs. 29.6 +/- 24.7, P=0.003, respectively). Multi-variate analyses showed that the SUVmax on both early and delayed scans, SUVmax, and RI (%) were the 4 independent factors to predict CRLM patients harboring KRAS mutations.ConclusionThe SUVmax on both early and delayed scans, SUVmax, and RI (%) may be the 4 independent factors to predict CRLM patients harboring KRAS mutations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available