4.7 Article

Accuracy of short-term sea ice drift forecasts using a coupled ice-ocean model

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS
Volume 120, Issue 12, Pages 7827-7841

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2015JC011273

Keywords

sea ice; forecast; short term; ice drift; buoys

Categories

Funding

  1. Office of Naval Research
  2. National Science Foundation Polar Program
  3. Office of Polar Programs (OPP)
  4. Directorate For Geosciences [1021274] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Arctic sea ice drift forecasts of 6 h-9 days for the summer of 2014 are generated using the Marginal Ice Zone Modeling and Assimilation System (MIZMAS); the model is driven by 6 h atmospheric forecasts from the Climate Forecast System (CFSv2). Forecast ice drift speed is compared to drifting buoys and other observational platforms. Forecast positions are compared with actual positions 24 h-8 days since forecast. Forecast results are further compared to those from the forecasts generated using an ice velocity climatology driven by multiyear integrations of the same model. The results are presented in the context of scheduling the acquisition of high-resolution images that need to follow buoys or scientific research platforms. RMS errors for ice speed are on the order of 5 km/d for 24-48 h since forecast using the sea ice model compared with 9 km/d using climatology. Predicted buoy position RMS errors are 6.3 km for 24 h and 14 km for 72 h since forecast. Model biases in ice speed and direction can be reduced by adjusting the air drag coefficient and water turning angle, but the adjustments do not affect verification statistics. This suggests that improved atmospheric forecast forcing may further reduce the forecast errors. The model remains skillful for 8 days. Using the forecast model increases the probability of tracking a target drifting in sea ice with a 10 km x 10 km image from 60 to 95% for a 24 h forecast and from 27 to 73% for a 48 h forecast.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available