4.6 Review

First-Principles Modeling of Defects in Lead Halide Perovskites: Best Practices and Open Issues

Journal

ACS ENERGY LETTERS
Volume 3, Issue 9, Pages 2206-2222

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b01212

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Union [763977]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lead halide perovskites are outstanding materials, showing long lifetimes of photogenerated carriers that induce high conversion efficiencies in solar cells and light-emitting devices. Native defects can severely limit the efficiency of optoelectronic devices by acting as carrier recombination centers. The study of defects in lead halide perovskites thus assumes a prominent role in further advancing the exploitation of this class of materials. The perovskites' defect chemistry has been mainly investigated by computational methods based on density functional theory. The complex electronic structure of perovskites, however, poses challenges to the accuracy of such calculations. In this work, we review the state of the art of defects calculations in lead halide perovskites, discussing the major technical issues commonly encountered and what we believe to be the best practices. By keeping as a test case the prototype MAPbI(3) compound, we discuss the impact of the exchange-correlation functional on the electronic structure and on the defect formation energies (DFEs) by comparing semilocal and hybrid functionals, with and without spin-orbit coupling corrections. The convergence of calculated defect structures and their DFEs with respect to the simulation supercell size and the performance of commonly employed charge corrections is thus discussed. A summary of results concerning the defect chemistry of MAPbI(3) is provided, providing hints on the so-called defect tolerance of this material class and casting possible scenarios to be addressed by experimental investigations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available