4.1 Article

Safety Supervisory Strategy for an Upper-Limb Rehabilitation Robot Based on Impedance Control

Journal

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.5772/55094

Keywords

Rehabilitation Robot; Safety and Robustness; Fuzzy Logic; Impedance Control

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61104206, 61105048, 61272379]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of JiangSu Province [BK2010063]
  3. Technology Project Foundation of JiangSu Province [BE2012740]
  4. Industrial Technology Project Foundation of the ChangZhou Government [CE20120085]
  5. Ph.D. Program Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China [20110092120034]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

User security is an important consideration for robots that interact with humans, especially for upper-limb rehabilitation robots, during the use of which stroke patients are often more susceptible to injury. In this paper, a novel safety supervisory control method incorporating fuzzy logic is proposed so as to guarantee the impaired limb's safety should an emergency situation occur and the robustness of the upper-limb rehabilitation robot control system. Firstly, a safety supervisory fuzzy controller (SSFC) was designed based on the impaired-limb's real-time physical state by extracting and recognizing the impaired-limb's tracking movement features. Then, the proposed SSFC was used to automatically regulate the desired force either to account for reasonable disturbance resulting from pose or position changes or to respond in adequate time to an emergency based on an evaluation of the impaired-limb's physical condition. Finally, a position-based impedance controller was implemented to achieve compliance between the robotic end-effector and the impaired limb during the robot-assisted rehabilitation training. The experimental results show the effectiveness and potential of the proposed method for achieving safety and robustness for the rehabilitation robot.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available