4.1 Article

Infection-free surgery: how to improve hand-hygiene compliance and eradicate methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from surgical wards

Journal

Publisher

ROYAL COLL SURGEONS ENGLAND
DOI: 10.1308/003588410X12628812459931

Keywords

MRSA; Surgery; HCAI; Nosocomial; Infection; Handwashing

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

INTRODUCTION Healthcare-associated infections cost the UK National Health Service billion per annum. Poor hand hygiene is the main route of transmission for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), leading to increased mortality and morbidity for infected patients. This study aims to quantify MRSA infection rates and compliance of alcohol gel application at the entrance to a surgical ward and assess how a simple intervention affects compliance. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Compliance was assessed via a discretely positioned close-surveillance camera at the ward entrance. Footage was reviewed to monitor compliance of all persons entering the ward over a 12-month period. RESULTS For the initial 6 months, mean alcohol gel compliance was 24% for all persons entering the ward. After this period, a conspicuous strip of bright red tape was positioned along the corridor approaching the ward entrance. The red line continued up the wall to an arrow head pointing to the two alcohol gel dispensers on the wall. Mean compliance over the subsequent 6 months significantly improved to 62% (P < 0.0001). Compliance improved for all persons entering the ward as follows (before - after, significance): doctors (0% - 54%, P < 0.01); nurses (24% - 75%, P < 0.05); porters (21% - 67%, P < 0.05); visitors (35% - 68%, P 0.01); patients (23% - 44%, P > 0.05). There were two cases of MRSA bacteraemia in the initial 6 months and no cases in the following 6 months with the red line in situ. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates how a simple intervention significantly improves hand-hygiene compliance with associated eradication of MRSA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available