4.5 Article

Marsh-atmosphere CO2 exchange in a New England salt marsh

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-BIOGEOSCIENCES
Volume 120, Issue 9, Pages 1825-1838

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2015JG003044

Keywords

salt marsh; eddy covariance; inundation; NDVI; tide; carbon

Funding

  1. NSF [OCE-1058747, OCE-1238212]
  2. Directorate For Geosciences
  3. Division Of Ocean Sciences [1238212] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We studied marsh-atmosphere exchange of carbon dioxide in a high marsh dominated salt marsh during the months of May to October in 2012-2014. Tidal inundation at the site occurred only during biweekly spring tides, during which we observed a reduction in fluxes during day and night. We estimated net ecosystem exchange (NEE), gross primary production (GPP), and ecosystem respiration (R-eco) using a modified PLIRTLE model, which requires photosynthetically active radiation, temperature, and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) as control variables. NDVI decreased during inundation, when the marsh canopy was submerged. Two-time series of NDVI, including and excluding effects of tidal inundation, allowed us to quantify the flux reduction during inundation. The effect of the flux reduction was small (2-4%) at our site, but is likely higher for marshes at a lower elevation. From May to October, GPP averaged -863 g C m(-2), R-eco averaged 591 g C m(-2), and NEE averaged -291 g C m(-2). In 2012, which was an exceptionally warm year, we observed an early start of net carbon uptake but higher respiration than in 2013 and 2014 due to higher-air temperature in August. This resulted in the lowest NEE during the study period (-255.96.9 g C m(-2)). The highest seasonal net uptake (-336.56.3 g C m(-2)) was observed in 2013, which was linked to higher rainfall and temperature in July. Mean sea level was very similar during all 3years which allowed us to isolate the importance of climatic factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available