4.2 Article

Improving Sensitivity in Ultrasound Molecular Imaging by Tailoring Contrast Agent Size Distribution: In Vivo Studies

Journal

MOLECULAR IMAGING
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages 87-95

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.2310/7290.2010.00005

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health Roadmap [1R21EB005325]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Molecular imaging with ultrasound relies on microbubble contrast agents (MCAs) selectively adhering to a ligand-specific target. Prior studies have shown that only small quantities of microbubbles are retained at their target sites, therefore, enhancing contrast sensitivity to low concentrations of microbubbles is essential to improve molecular imaging techniques. In order to assess the effect of MCA diameter on imaging sensitivity, perfusion and molecular imaging studies were performed with microbubbles of varying size distributions. To assess signal improvement and MCA circulation time as a function of size and concentration, blood perfusion was imaged in rat kidneys using nontargeted size-sorted MCAs with a Siemens Sequoia ultrasound system (Siemans, Mountain View, CA) in cadence pulse sequencing (CPS) mode. Molecular imaging sensitivity improvements were studied with size-sorted alpha(v)beta(3)-targeted bubbles in both fibrosarcoma and R3230 rat tumor models. In perfusion imaging studies, video intensity and contrast persistence was approximate to 8 times and approximate to 3 times greater respectively, for sorted 3-micron MCAs (diameter, 3.3 +/- 1.95 mu m) when compared to unsorted MCAs (diameter, 0.9 +/- 0.45 mu m) at low concentrations. In targeted experiments, application of sorted 3-micron MCAs resulted in a approximate to 20 times video intensity increase over unsorted populations. Tailoring size-distributions results in substantial imaging sensitivity improvement over unsorted populations, which is essential in maximizing sensitivity to small numbers of MCAs for molecular imaging.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available