4.0 Review

3D imaging and quantitative analysis of small solubilized membrane proteins and their complexes by transmission electron microscopy

Journal

MICROSCOPY
Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages 95-107

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jmicro/dfs091

Keywords

3D-electron microscopy; detergent belt; membrane protein complex; negative staining; rhodopsin-transducin complex; scanning transmission electron microscopy

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [EY008061, EY021126, EY019478, U54GM094598]
  2. Maurice E. Muller Foundation of Switzerland
  3. NIH Protein Structure Initiative [U54GM094598]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Inherently unstable, detergent-solubilized membrane protein complexes can often not be crystallized. For complexes that have a mass of >300 kDa, cryo-electron microscopy (EM) allows their three-dimensional (3D) structure to be assessed to a resolution that makes secondary structure elements visible in the best case. However, many interesting complexes exist whose mass is below 300 kDa and thus need alternative approaches. Two methods are reviewed: (i) Mass measurement in a scanning transmission electron microscope, which has provided important information on the stoichiometry of membrane protein complexes. This technique is applicable to particulate, filamentous and sheet-like structures. (ii) 3D-EM of negatively stained samples, which determines the molecular envelope of small membrane protein complexes. Staining and dehydration artifacts may corrupt the quality of the 3D map. Staining conditions thus need to be optimized. 3D maps of plant aquaporin SoPIP2;1 tetramers solubilized in different detergents illustrate that the flattening artifact can be partially prevented and that the detergent itself contributes significantly. Another example discussed is the complex of G protein-coupled receptor rhodopsin with its cognate G protein transducin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available