4.0 Article

Evaluation of imaging plates as recording medium for images of negatively stained single particles and electron diffraction patterns of two-dimensional crystals

Journal

JOURNAL OF ELECTRON MICROSCOPY
Volume 59, Issue 1, Pages 53-63

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jmicro/dfp036

Keywords

imaging plates; negative staining; single-particle electron microscopy; two-dimensional crystals; electron diffraction

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [RO1 EY015107, RO1 GM082927, PO1 GM62580]
  2. Giovanni Armenise Harvard Center for Structural Biology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We evaluated imaging plates (IPs) and the DITABIS Micron scanner for their use in recording images of negatively stained single-particle specimens and electron diffraction patterns of two-dimensional crystals. We first established the optimal imaging and read-out conditions for images of negatively stained single-particle specimens using the signal-to-noise ratio of the images as the evaluation criterion. We found that images were best recorded on IPs at a magnification of 67 000x, read out with a gain setting of 20 000 and a laser power setting of 30% with subsequent binning over 2 x 2 pixels. Our results show that for images of negatively stained specimens, for which the resolution is limited to similar to 20 A, IPs are a good alternative to EM film. We also compared IPs with a 2K x 2K Gatan charge-coupled device (CCD) camera for their use in recording electron diffraction patterns of sugar-embedded two-dimensional crystals. Diffraction patterns of aquaporin-0 recorded on IPs and with the CCD camera showed reflections beyond 3 A and had similar R-Friedel as well as R-merge values. IPs can thus be used to collect diffraction patterns, but CCD cameras are more convenient and remain the best option for recording electron diffraction patterns.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available