4.1 Article

Combined use of multiday palonosetron with aprepitant and low-dose dexamethasone in prevention of nausea and emesis among patients with multiple myeloma and lymphoma undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant: A pilot study

Journal

JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PHARMACY PRACTICE
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 263-269

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1078155213502103

Keywords

Aprepitant; autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant; chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting; nnultiday palonosetron

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The current standard for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea/vomiting in autologous stem cell transplant only achieves 4-20% emetic control. Objectives: To assess emetic responses to multiday palonosetron, aprepitant, and low-dose dexamethasone among patients with nnyelonna and lymphoma undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Methods: Oral aprepitant 125/80/80 mg was administered with intravenous dexamethasone 4 mg and palonosetron 0.25 mg on days -3, -2, -1 for multiple myeloma and days -7 through -3 for lymphoma. Palonosetron was repeated day +3 in both groups. Results: A total of 20 patients were enrolled and 18 analyzed. None experienced emetic failure with complete control achieved in 78, 33, and 17% in the acute, delayed, and extended phases, respectively. Nausea occurred in 78% although not significant in 61%, with median Nausea Visual Score of 4.5. Quality of life correlated with emetic and nausea control. Eight patients developed grade 2-3 nonhematologic toxicities with only one event attributed to the study medications. Conclusions: This triplet regimen was feasible with acceptable safety profile in the autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant setting. Emetic control was best achieved in the acute phase. Lesser degree of emetic and nausea control in the delayed and extended phases impacted quality of life. Our results warrant further evaluation in a larger autologous hennatopoietic stem cell transplant population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available