4.5 Article

Seasonal and diurnal cycles of liquid water in snow-Measurements and modeling

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-EARTH SURFACE
Volume 120, Issue 10, Pages 2139-2154

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2015JF003593

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DFG [EI 672/6]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
  3. DFG Emmy Noether programme grant [EI 672/5]
  4. NSF
  5. NASA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Evaluating and improving snow models and outflow predictions for hydrological applications is hindered by the lack of continuous data on bulk volumetric liquid water content (theta(w)) and storage capacity of the melting snowpack. The combination of upward looking ground-penetrating radar and conventional snow height sensors enable continuous, nondestructive determinations of theta(w) in natural snow covers from first surficial wetting until shortly before melt out. We analyze diurnal and seasonal cycles of theta(w) for 4years in a flat study site and for three melt seasons on slopes and evaluate model simulations for two different water transport schemes in the snow cover model SNOWPACK. Observed maximum increases in theta(w) during a day are below 1.7vol% (90th percentile) at the flat site. Concerning seasonal characteristics of theta(w), less than 10% of recorded data exceed 5 vol% at the flat site and 3.5vol% at slopes. Both water transport schemes in SNOWPACK underestimate maximum theta(w) at the flat site systematically for all observed melt seasons, while simulated theta(w) maxima on slopes are accurate. Implementing observed changes in theta(w) per day in outflow predictions increases model performance toward higher agreement with lysimeter measurements. Hence, continuously monitoring theta(w) improves our understanding of liquid water percolation and retention in snow, which is highly relevant for several aspects of the cryosphere such as avalanche formation, catchment hydrology, and ice sheet mass balances.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available