4.5 Article

Reconstructing a sediment pulse: Modeling the effect of placer mining on Fraser River, Canada

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-EARTH SURFACE
Volume 120, Issue 7, Pages 1436-1454

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2015JF003491

Keywords

sediment transport; morphodynamic model; mountain river; aggradation; sediment supply; mine waste

Funding

  1. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) discovery grant
  2. NSERC discovery grants

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gold mining along 525 km of the Fraser River between 1858 and 1909 added an estimated 1.1 x 10(8)t of tailings, half gravel and the rest finer, to the river's natural sediment load. We simulate the response using a 1-D multigrain size morphodynamic model. Since premining conditions are unknown and modern data are insufficient for tuning the process representation, we devised a novel modeling strategy which may be useful in other data-poor applications. We start the model from a smoothed version of the modern longitudinal profile with bed grain size distributions optimized to match alternative assumptions about natural sediment supply and compare runs that include mining with control runs that can be used to quantify the effects of deficiencies in process representation and initialization. Simulations with an appropriate choice of natural supply rate closely match the best available test data, which consist of a detailed 1952-1999 gravel budget for the distal part of the model domain. The simulations suggest that the main response to mining was rapid bed fining, which allowed a major increase in bed load transport rate with only slight (similar to 0.1m) mean aggradation within the mining region and most of the excess sediment exported well beyond the mountain front within the mining period or soon afterward. We compare this pattern of response by a large, powerful river with previous case studies of river adjustment to sediment supply change.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available