4.7 Article

Rapid impact assessment matrix (RIAM) analysis as decision tool to select new site for municipal solid waste disposal: A case study of Dehradun city, India

Journal

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages 12-19

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2014.03.007

Keywords

Municipal waste; Environmental impact assessment; Urban planning

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The selection of appropriate site for creation of new MSW disposal facility is an important task of waste management engineering. The ecological, social and economical issues pertaining to new project should be analyzed in order to measure the overall impact of the new waste disposal project. In this study rapid impact assessment matrix (RIAM) which comes under one of the options of environmental impact assessment (EIA) was used to see the overall rating of the site to establish a possible new MSW disposal site for the city. The suitability of the site was evaluated considering ecological, social, cultural and economical as components in decision support system. Different components were used to produce a cumulative score, i.e. environmental score (ES) for each option of the site for the new project. Results suggests that RIAM can be a reliable tool to identify the suitability of the site for MSW disposal facility creation in accordance with ecological, physical, biological, social/cultural and economic quality of the project. In this city, for physical/chemical component the forest distribution was the major factor in site selection while biological/ecological components showed the negative impact of project in all sub-sectors. Sociocultural and economical components showed the different ranges of ES. This study extends the possibility of utilizing RIAM as tool in decision supporting system for establishing MSW disposal facilities in any urban center. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available