4.2 Article

A worldwide multicentre comparison of assays for cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease

Journal

ANNALS OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 46, Issue -, Pages 235-240

Publisher

ROYAL SOC MEDICINE PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1258/acb.2009.008232

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Different cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) amyloid-beta 1-42 (A beta(1-42)), total Tau (Tau) and Tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 (P-Tau) levels are reported, but currently there is a lack of quality control programmes. The aim of this study was to compare the measurements of these CSIF biomarkers, between and within centres. Methods: Three CSIF-pool samples were distributed to 13 laboratories in 2004 and the same samples were again distributed to 18 laboratories in 2008. In 2004 six laboratories measured A beta(1-42), Tau and P-Tau and seven laboratories measured one or two of these marker(s) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). In 2008,12 laboratories measured all three markers, three laboratories measured one or two marker(s) by ELISAs and three laboratories measured the markers by Luminex. Results: In 2004, the ELISA intercentre coefficients of variance (interCV) were 31%, 21% and 13% for A beta(1-42), Tau and P-Tau, respectively. These were 37%,16% and 15%, respectively, in 2008. When we restricted the analysis to the Innotest (R) (N = 13) for A beta(1-42), lower interCV were calculated (22%). The centres that participated in both years (N = 9) showed interCVs of 21%, 15% and 9% and intra-centre coefficients (intraCV) of variance of 25%, 18% and 7% in 2008. Conclusions: The highest variability was found for A beta(1-42). The variabilities for Tau and P-Tau were lower in both years. The centres that participated in both years showed a high intraCV comparable to their interCV, indicating that there is not only a high variation between but also within centres. Besides a uniform standardization of (pre)analytical procedures, the same assay should be used to decrease the inter/intracentre variation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available