4.2 Article

Anticipated classes of new medications and molecular targets for pulmonary arterial hypertension

Journal

PULMONARY CIRCULATION
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 226-244

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.4103/2045-8932.109940

Keywords

pulmonary arterial hypertension; cellular mechanisms; inflammation; metabolism; tyrosine kinase inhibition; genetics; epigenetics; apoptosis

Funding

  1. Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute
  2. British Heart Foundation [RG/13/4/30107] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0509-10174] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL071115, R01HL114887, R01HL087118, R01HL074186, R01HL113003] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) remains a life-limiting condition with a major impact on the ability to lead a normal life. Although existing therapies may improve the outlook in some patients there remains a major unmet need to develop more effective therapies in this condition. There have been significant advances in our understanding of the genetic, cell and molecular basis of PAH over the last few years. This research has identified important new targets that could be explored as potential therapies for PAH. In this review we discuss whether further exploitation of vasoactive agents could bring additional benefits over existing approaches. Approaches to enhance smooth muscle cell apotosis and the potential of receptor tyrosine kinase inhibition are summarised. We evaluate the role of inflammation, epigenetic changes and altered glycolytic metabolism as potential targets for therapy, and whether inherited genetic mutations in PAH have revealed druggable targets. The potential of cell based therapies and gene therapy are also discussed. Potential candidate pathways that could be explored in the context of experimental medicine are identified.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available