4.2 Review

Gender, sex hormones and pulmonary hypertension

Journal

PULMONARY CIRCULATION
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages 294-314

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.4103/2045-8932.114756

Keywords

pulmonary hypertension; estrogen; dehydroepiandrosterone; serotonin; bone morphogenetic protein receptor type II

Funding

  1. Career Development Award [NIH 5K23HL098743]
  2. British Heart Foundation [FS/10/019/28205, RG/11/7/28916] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most subtypes of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) are characterized by a greater susceptibility to disease among females, although females with PAH appear to live longer after diagnosis. While this estrogen paradox of enhanced female survival despite increased female susceptibility remains a mystery, recent progress has begun to shed light upon the interplay of sex hormones, the pathogenesis of pulmonary hypertension, and the right ventricular response to stress. For example, emerging data in humans and experimental models suggest that estrogens or differential sex hormone metabolism may modify disease risk among susceptible subjects, and that estrogens may interact with additional local factors such as serotonin to enhance the potentially damaging chronic effects of estrogens on the pulmonary vasculature. Regardless, it remains unclear why not all estrogenic compounds behave equally, nor why estrogens appear to be protective in certain settings but detrimental in others. The contribution of androgens and other compounds, such as dehydroepiandrosterone, to pathogenesis and possibly treatment must be considered as well. In this review, we will discuss the recent understandings on how estrogens, estrogen metabolism, dehydroepiandrosterone, and additional susceptibility factors may all contribute to the pathogenesis or potentially to the treatment of pulmonary hypertension, by evaluating current human, cell- based, and experimental model data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available