4.6 Article

Lightning channel length and flash energy determined from moments of the flash area distribution

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
Volume 120, Issue 17, Pages 8925-8940

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2015JD023766

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US National Science Foundation (NSF)
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
  3. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
  4. Deutsches Zentrum fur Luft-und Raumfahrt (DLR)
  5. [NSF-1063966]
  6. Directorate For Geosciences
  7. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences [1063966] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences
  9. Directorate For Geosciences [1205727] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A widely used approach in observational and modeling studies of NOx produced by lightning is to relate NOx production to the number of flashes, without regard for the distribution of lightning flash sizes. Recent studies have begun to consider channel length and flash size, which is now observable with VHF Lightning Mapping Array data. This study uses a capacitor model for flash energy based on the flash coverage area, which defines a size scale. This flash area is then filled with channel using a fractal method and compared to other methods that estimate length directly from the VHF source locations. In the presence of instrument measurement errors, area-and fractal-based estimates are shown to be more stable estimators of flash length than connect-the-dots approaches and therefore are better suited for comparison to NOx production. A geometric interpretation of using vertical profiles of VHF source density to weight the altitude distribution of total channel length is developed. An example of the time series of moments of the lightning flash size distribution is shown for an example case, and some meteorological interpretation is given.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available