4.5 Article

The magnitudes of the regions 1 and 2 Birkeland currents observed by AMPERE and their role in solar wind-magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling

Journal

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2014JA020138

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Funding Council (STFC) studentship
  2. STFC [ST/H002480/1, ST/K001000/1]
  3. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences
  4. Directorate For Geosciences [1420184] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/I505780/1, ST/K001000/1, 1237840, ST/H002480/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. STFC [ST/K001000/1, ST/I505780/1, ST/H002480/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper we present the first large-scale statistical study of the influence of magnetic reconnection on the magnitude of the regions 1 and 2 Birkeland field-aligned currents (FACs). While previous studies have employed single spacecraft measurements to construct a statistical picture of the location and density of the Birkeland currents, it has hitherto been difficult to compare in situ measurements of the solar wind with instantaneous global field-aligned current measurements. To that end, we utilize the Active Magnetosphere Planetary Electrodynamics Response Experiment (AMPERE), which yields field-aligned current density in both hemispheres at a cadence of 10 min. We quantify the amount of current flowing in the regions 1 (R1) and 2 (R2) FACs, and we compare these with the dayside reconnection rate Phi(D) deduced from interplanetary parameters from the OMNI data set and with the AL index to examine whether magnetic reconnection is responsible for driving currents in the coupled magnetosphere-ionosphere system. We find that current magnitudes are strongly correlated with both Phi(D) and AL index. We also find that R1 currents tend to be higher than R2 currents during periods of magnetic reconnection, suggesting leakage of current across the polar cap or an association with the substorm current wedge.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available