4.5 Article

Energization of O+ ions in the Earth's inner magnetosphere and the effects on ring current buildup: A review of previous observations and possible mechanisms

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS
Volume 118, Issue 7, Pages 4441-4464

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/jgra.50371

Keywords

heavy ions; ion energization; ring current; O plus dynamics; storm; substorm

Funding

  1. Van Allen Probes
  2. JHU/APL [937836, 967399]
  3. NASA [NAS5-01072]
  4. RBSP-ECT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In situ observations and modeling work have confirmed that singly charged oxygen ions, O+, which are of Earth's ionospheric origin, are heated/accelerated up to >100keV in the magnetosphere. The energetic O+ population makes a significant contribution to the plasma pressure in the Earth's inner magnetosphere during magnetic storms, although under quiet conditions, H+ dominates the plasma pressure. The pressure enhancements, which we term energization, are caused by adiabatic heating through earthward transport of source population in the plasma sheet, local acceleration in the inner magnetosphere and near-Earth plasma sheet, and enhanced ion supply from the topside ionosphere. The key issues regarding stronger O+ energization than H+ are nonadiabatic local acceleration, responsible for increase in O+ temperature, and more significant O+ supply than H+, responsible for the increase in O+ density. Although several acceleration mechanisms and O+ supply processes have been proposed, it remains an open question what mechanism(s)/process(es) play the dominant role in stronger O+ energization. This review paper summarizes important previous spacecraft observations, introduces the proposed mechanisms/processes that generate O+-rich energetic plasma population, and outlines possible scenarios of O+ pressure abundance in the Earth's inner magnetosphere.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available