4.5 Article

Numerical analysis of 2010 high-mountain (Tien-Shan) experiment on observations of thunderstorm-related low-energy neutron emissions

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS
Volume 118, Issue 12, Pages 7905-7912

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2013JA019261

Keywords

neutron transport; thunderstorm atmosphere; Monte Carlo simulation

Funding

  1. European Union [3993-2010]
  2. DARPA [HR0011-10-1-0061]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The high-mountain experiment in a thunderstorm atmosphere, in which extraordinary high flux of low-energy neutrons was detected, is analyzed. Due to the lack of data on the radiation source, we do not analyze directly measured absolute count rates. Instead, we address the experimental configuration, namely, simultaneous measurements by shielded and unshielded helium counters, which allow a comparison of relative count rates and, thus, verifying the species of the detected radiation. Results of Monte Carlo simulations of neutron transport executed without aprioristic assumptions, using only data on the experimental configuration, have raised strong doubts as to whether the detected increases of the count rates can be attributed to neutrons. Results of simulations allowing for the neutron transport in atmosphere from distant (100-500 m) photoneutron source with spectrum in the range 0-20.1 MeV produced by relativistic runaway electron avalanche bremsstrahlung demonstrate that ratios R of the count rates of shielded and unshielded counters below 1 keV are manyfold higher than the ratios R-exp approximate to 0.34-1.06 of the measured count rates. In the total range 0-20.1 MeV, the R magnitudes vary from 0.14 to 0.84 depending on the distance to the neutron source. Results of simulations of rays transport executed without aprioristic assumptions demonstrate that, most likely, hard rays with energies E>1 MeV were detected. We note that in thunderstorm environment, a selection is required of neutrons and rays, for which the time-of-flight technique is the most adequate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available