4.1 Review

Observations and modelling of the global distribution and long-term trend of atmospheric 14CO2

Journal

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0889.2009.00446.x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education and Science, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
  2. German Science Foundation
  3. German Minister of Environmen
  4. German Minister of Science and Technology
  5. German Umweltbundesamt
  6. European Commission, Brussels

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Global high-precision atmospheric delta 14CO(2) records covering the last two decades are presented, and evaluated in terms of changing (radio)carbon sources and sinks, using the coarse-grid carbon cycle model GRACE. Dedicated simulations of global trends and interhemispheric differences with respect to atmospheric CO2 as well as delta 13CO(2) and delta 14CO(2), are shown to be in good agreement with the available observations (1940-2008). While until the 1990s the decreasing trend of delta 14CO(2) was governed by equilibration of the atmospheric bomb 14C perturbation with the oceans and terrestrial biosphere, the largest perturbation today are emissions of 14C-free fossil fuel CO2. This source presently depletes global atmospheric delta 14CO(2) by 12-14 parts per thousand yr-1, which is partially compensated by 14CO(2) release from the biosphere, industrial 14C emissions and natural 14C production. Fossil fuel emissions also drive the changing north-south gradient, showing lower delta 14C in the northern hemisphere only since 2002. The fossil fuel-induced north-south (and also troposphere-stratosphere) delta 14CO(2) gradient today also drives the tropospheric delta 14CO(2) seasonality through variations of air mass exchange between these atmospheric compartments. Neither the observed temporal trend nor the delta 14CO(2) north-south gradient may constrain global fossil fuel CO2 emissions to better than 25%, due to large uncertainties in other components of the (radio)carbon cycle.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available