4.7 Article

Historical wave height trends in the South and East China Seas, 1911-2010

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS
Volume 119, Issue 7, Pages 4399-4409

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2014JC010087

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council
  2. Climate Research Division of the Science and Technology Branch of Environment Canada
  3. the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2009B10214]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reconstructs 6 hourly significant wave heights (H-s) in the South and East China Seas for the period 1871-2010, using the Twentieth Century Reanalysis ensemble of mean sea level pressure (SLP) fields and a multivariate regression model to represent the H-s-SLP relationship in each study area. The regression model was calibrated and validated using the ERA-Interim reanalysis of H-s and SLP for the period 1981-2010. These reconstructions were found to reproduce reasonably well the seasonal mean and maximum H-s climates as represented by the ERA40 and ERA-Interim wave reanalyses. For each study area, an ensemble of 56 members of 6 hourly H-s was reconstructed for each grid point. The regional mean series of the ensemble mean of the reconstructed consecutive monthly mean H-s was tested for temporal homogeneity, which identified a few discontinuities in the pre-1946 period and led to the exclusion of the reconstructed H-s for 1871-1910 from trend analysis (due to data uncertainty and inhomogeneity). Each 6 hourly H-s time series for the period 1911-2010 was homogenized for the identified discontinuities, before being used to derive annual and seasonal mean and maximum H-s for trend analysis. The trend analysis results show that, in both study areas, the 1911-2010 wave height trends are dominantly negative, with the exception that the seasonal maximum significant wave heights seem to have increased in summer and spring in the central South China Sea and in summer in the East China Sea.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available