4.2 Article

Studies on the de/re-hydrogenation characteristics of nanocrystalline MgH2 admixed with carbon nanofibres

Journal

APPLIED NANOSCIENCE
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages 195-201

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13204-012-0083-y

Keywords

Hydrogen storage materials; MgH2; Carbon nanostructures

Funding

  1. Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE), DST (UNANST), UGC-New Delhi (India)
  2. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present investigation, we have synthesized different morphologies of carbon nanofibres (CNFs) to investigate their catalytic effect on the hydrogenation characteristics of 25 h ball-milled MgH2 (nano MgH2). The TEM analysis reveals that 25 h of ball-milling leads to the formation of nanocrystalline particles with size ranging between 10 and 20 nm. Different morphologies of CNFs were synthesized by catalytic thermal decomposition of acetylene (C2H2) gas over LaNi5 alloy. Helical carbon nanofibers (HCNFs) were formed at a temperature 650 degrees C. By increasing the synthesis temperature to 750 degrees C, planar carbon nanofibres were formed. In order to explore the effectiveness of CNFs towards lowering the decomposition temperature, TPD experiments (at heating rate 5 degrees C/min) were performed for nano MgH2 with and without CNFs. It was found that the decomposition temperature is reduced to similar to 334 and similar to 300 degrees C from 367 degrees C for the PCNF and HCNF catalysed nano MgH2. It is also found that HCNF admixed nano MgH2 absorbs similar to 5.25 wt% within 10 min as compared with pristine nano MgH2, which absorbs only similar to 4.2 % within the same time and same condition of temperature and pressure. Thus the HCNF possesses better catalytic activity than PCNF. These different levels of improvement in hydrogenation properties of HCNF catalysed nano MgH2 is attributed to the morphology of the CNFs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available