4.7 Article

Fluid Injection and the Mechanics of Frictional Stability of Shale-Bearing Faults

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH
Volume 123, Issue 10, Pages 8364-8384

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2018JB016084

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Horizon 2020 innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie [656676 FEAT]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fluid overpressure is one of the primary mechanisms for triggering tectonic fault slip and human-induced seismicity. This mechanism is appealing because fluid overpressure reduces the effective normal stress, hence favoring fault reactivation. However, upon fault reactivation models of earthquake nucleation suggest that increased fluid pressure should favor stable sliding rather than dynamic failure. Here we describe laboratory experiments on shale fault gouge, conducted in the double direct shear configuration in a true-triaxial machine. To characterize frictional stability and hydrological properties we performed three types of experiments: (1) stable sliding shear experiments to determine the material failure envelope and permeability, (2) velocity step experiments to determine the rate-and-state frictional properties, and (3) creep experiments to study fault slip evolution with increasing pore fluid pressure. The shale gouge shows low frictional strength, mu = 0.28, and permeability, k similar to 10(-19) m(2) together with a velocity strengthening behavior indicative of aseismic slip. During fault pressurization, we document that upon failure slip velocity remains slow (i.e., v similar to 200 mu m/s), not approaching dynamic slip rates. We relate this fault slip behavior to the interplay between the fault weakening induced by fluid pressurization, the strong rate-strengthening behavior of shales, and the evolution of fault zone structure. Our data show that fault rheology and fault stability is controlled by the coupling between fluid pressure and rate-and-state friction parameters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available